Tennessee’s Approach to Sports Prediction Markets
Tennessee’s Approach to Sports Prediction Markets
In the evolving landscape of sports betting, Tennessee has stepped into the spotlight by asserting that only its state regulator can approve sports betting activities. This comes in response to the emerging trend of prediction markets that offer event contracts tied to sporting outcomes.

State’s Regulatory Position
Mary Beth Thomas, Executive Director of the Tennessee Sports Wagering Council (SWC), has voiced the state’s stance in a formal letter to the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She highlighted that under the Tennessee Sports Gaming Act, sports wagering licenses are considered a taxable privilege, explicitly issued by the SWC.
Concerns Over Prediction Markets
Thomas articulated that these event contracts, offered by companies like Crypto.com and Kalshi, functionally behave as wagers on sports, as buyers’ profits or losses rely on the outcomes of sporting events. Thus, without proper licensing, such activities would violate state regulations.
Comparison to Other States
While Tennessee hasn’t joined other states like Illinois and New Jersey in issuing cease-and-desist orders against prediction markets, their position indicates a serious examination of regulatory frameworks. States like Connecticut and Massachusetts are also actively looking into these markets.
Legal Precedents and Considerations
Recent legal decisions have indicated that prediction markets might navigate state regulations by claiming federal authority. For instance, a federal court in Nevada recently ruled in favor of Kalshi, allowing it to operate despite state challenges. Tennessee may need to consider such federal implications in their regulatory approach.
Broader Implications for Gambling Laws
Beyond just prediction markets, Thomas indicated broader concerns under the state gaming act regarding fund accounts, explicitly banning credit card and cryptocurrency transactions for sports betting.
- Many states enforce similar restrictions to prevent potential gambling issues.
- Concerns have also been raised regarding the use of collegiate athlete actions in betting scenarios, which remain prohibited.
Conclusion
Tennessee’s firm position on sports betting and prediction markets underscores the ongoing challenges states face in regulating this rapidly evolving industry. Their proactive stance may set the tone for future regulations across the nation.



















